For a full list of states that will see an increase – and how they compare to the federal levels – visit the DOL’s State Minimum Wage Law page. These predictable scheduling laws tend to share several commonalities: Advance notice to employees of work schedules. Six cities and one state have predictive scheduling laws. Senate Bill 57-17 would require employers to post schedules two weeks in advance. These scheduling laws, alternately referred to as predictive, secure, fair or predictable, impose an increased number of requirements on employers in addition to extending retaliation protections to employees. Vermont and San Francisco passed laws that gave employees within their jurisdiction the freedom to request more flexible work arrangements. In addition to a poster in the workplace, employers are usually required to provide notice upon hiring a new employee and in the employee handbook. Most predictive scheduling laws around the country have been passed on a local level, which means the specific laws that apply to you depend on which state you live in. employees could not sue for violations of the law). In addition, San Francisco’s predictive scheduling ordinance applies to all retail employers with at least 40 locations worldwide and 20 or more employees in San Francisco. Prohibited: Arkansas, Georgia, Iowa, and Tennessee. Some have provisions that will phase in over time. Since the first predictive scheduling law arose in San Francisco several years ago, other states and major U.S. cities have contributed to a precipitous rise in these laws. In the state of Washington, an individual who has been deemed as a law-abiding citizen who is of sound mind and moral character is permitted to adopt a child: • Within the state of Washington, and individual must maintain residence for a period of no less than 6 months Seattle’s Secure Scheduling Ordinance was the second citywide scheduling law. Scheduling laws came onto the scene in the U.S in 2014. Looking ahead: New Jersey, California and Los Angeles, among other jurisdictions, are also considering predictive scheduling laws. Some cities, such as San Jose, San Francisco, Seattle, New York City, and Washington, D.C. have also enacted laws related to predictive scheduling, which have added stability … Predictive Scheduling laws, also known as Fair Scheduling laws, are an emerging trend in the United States. Implemented in July 2017, retail and food service companies in Seattle, with 400 employees worldwide, must now post work schedules two weeks in advance and pay employees when the schedule changes. ### Contact: Sage Wilson, Working Washington: sage@workingwa.org. Predictive Scheduling. Washington Seattle Secure Scheduling Ordinance. Predictable scheduling laws passed in the past few years cover an estimated 740,000 workers and 1,000 employers in at least four cities and one state, according to a July research report from the Economic Policy Institute, an independent nonprofit think tank. Working Washington is the voice for workers in our state. Predictive scheduling laws generally require employers to comply with certain requirements to ensure greater work schedule certainty for employees, particularly in … While this is still a newer law, it will continue to be refined into 2022. View the law CALIFORNIA San Francisco Effective Date: July 3, 2015 Employers Affected: "Formula Retail Use" employers in San Francisco with at least 40 retail… This bill is for employers in food services, hospitality, or retail establishment that employs 100 or more employees worldwide, except that a full service restaurant must also have 40 or more full service restaurant locations worldwide. Retail employers beware: New York City’s predictive scheduling law went into effect on November 26, 2017, and now New York State is now getting in the mix. Early predictive scheduling laws only applied to retail establishments and restaurants, with limited penalties and no private right of action (i.e. Following similar ordinances regulating employee hours passed at municipal levels in Emeryville, California; New York City; San Francisco; San Jose; Seattle; and Washington, D.C., Oregon becomes the latest jurisdiction and the first state to enact a predictive scheduling law. Predictive scheduling laws generally require employers to comply with certain requirements to ensure greater work schedule certainty for employees, particularly in the fast food and retail industries. Similar laws have also been passed in San Francisco, New York City, Oregon, Philadelphia, and other jurisdictions over the last few years. There is a mix of state-wide laws and local laws. Let’s look at the current state of predictive scheduling legislation. In many cities, it is becoming part of the law. In addition to New York City, including Chicago, Philadelphia, San Francisco, Seattle, Washington, D.C., and the state of Oregon have passed similar laws. Since the first predictive scheduling law arose in San Francisco several years ago, other states and major U.S. cities have contributed to a precipitous rise in these laws. We are seeing this shift from on-call scheduling to predictive scheduling for a few reasons: As of this writing, Oregon has the only state-wide predictive scheduling law. As a result, four cities and one state in the U.S. have passed predictive scheduling laws that make scheduling practices fairer for workers. Also, San Francisco City Council passed a predictive scheduling law in January 2015 that requires all retail employers to pay employees for cancelled on-call shifts and provide notice to employees of their biweekly schedules. Unpredictable schedules and late notice for assigned shifts make it difficult for hourly restaurant workers to find childcare, go to school, or schedule transportation. Washington, D.C. looked into predictive scheduling earlier in 2016, but the bill was tabled indefinitely in June. On the eve of the November 26, 2017 effective date of New York City’s own predictive scheduling regulations that affect retail and fast food employers, 1 the New York State Department of Labor has issued proposed predictive scheduling regulations for certain industries. Applies to. The proposed regulations would revise the Minimum Wage Order for the Miscellaneous Industries and Occupations … Unpredictable scheduling practices in the retail and restaurant industries have led some cities, including San Francisco and Seattle, to pass or consider laws that provide more stability for workers. Oregon lawmakers have approved the nation's first statewide law on predictable scheduling for employees.. Seattle passed its secure scheduling law in 2016. Predictive Scheduling Laws: What Are They? While most changes will become effective January 1, others take place later in the year. Retail, food services or drinking establishments in Seattle with 500 or more employees worldwide. Editor's note: For a regularly updated list of predictive scheduling laws, see the predictive scheduling law tracker. Yes, the state of Oregon is the first state to pass a predictable scheduling law. Seattle's Secure Scheduling Ordinance Seattle became the latest city to pass predictive scheduling legislation with a unanimous vote on the Secure Scheduling Ordinance. The Washington legislature is considering “secure scheduling” for employees across the state. Legislation Passed That Involves Employee Scheduling. A survey of state and local predictive scheduling laws (also referred to as secure scheduling or fair workweek laws). Washington State & Federal Labor Law Poster Wisconsin State & Federal Labor Law Poster West Virginia State & Federal Labor Law Poster ... Oregon Predictive Scheduling Law by State and Federal Poster. This can usually be done electronically through an employee portal. A survey of state and local predictive scheduling laws (also referred to as secure scheduling or fair workweek laws). Additionally, some states have outright prohibited the predictive scheduling law. There are no predictive scheduling requirements in California While not a law in California, other states and local cities have passed scheduling mandates that require employers to set schedules for employees well in advance, and if the employer changes the schedules within a certain time frame, the employer must pay a penalty for the change. There are several state and local jurisdictions with predictive scheduling laws that could be triggered by a COVID-19 furlough, including California (Berkeley, Emeryville, and San Francisco only), Chicago, Illinois (effective July 1, 2020), Oregon, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (effective April 1, 2020), and Seattle, Washington. Predictive Scheduling. Seattle’s secure scheduling law covers coffee, fast food, and retail workers who work within the Seattle city limits and are employed by companies or chains with more than 500 global employees. (Committee Materials) Most of the ordinances adopted have already gone into effect. Full-service restaurant workers are covered if they work for companies or chains with more than 500 global employees and more than 40 global locations. ARKANSAS State-wide Ban on Predictive Scheduling Laws Effective Date: March 24, 2017 Employers Affected: None Local governments may not create or adopt employer requirements outside state or federal requirements. Seattle’s Secure Scheduling Law. Many cities and states have begun to propose regulations surrounding predictive scheduling or are at least considering … For example, the Fair Work Week Act in Oregon requires employees to give their employees at least 7 days notice in writing of their scheduled shifts. If you haven’t heard the term predictive scheduling , you soon will. If these required scheduling practices are violated, stiff penalties may be imposed. Washington State Predictive Scheduling, House Bill 1491, is currently being proposed in Washington state. Secure scheduling laws require employers to notify employees of their rights under the law. 1 “State and City Laws mandate Predictive Employee Scheduling,” QuickBooks, T Sheets, Updated January 2018, ... predictive scheduling mandates in 2014, just one in seven part-time workers are estimated to ... A similar analysis in Washington, D.C., which adopted a predictive scheduling law in 2015, came to similar conclusions. Predictive scheduling laws protect workers by requiring employers to follow certain practices to avoid unpredictable work schedules, which often deprive employees of a proper work-life balance.. Executive action taken in the House Committee on Labor & Workplace Standards at 8:00 AM. Predictive scheduling offers hourly workers more predictability in their work schedules. Enacted: California, Illinois, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, and Washington.