The standard Limitation of Liability clause for an online business looks something like this one from Micros… All Rights Reserved. Adding indemnification provisions for expenses incurred in addressing a breach of regulated personal information and protected health information (and adding a carve out for indemnification to the consequential damages disclaimer). The court then dismissed LMT’s claim for breach of contract because it had agreed to waive all consequential damages—even though claims for breach of confidentiality were exempted from the contract’s separate cap on total damages. Silverpop / IBM Campaign automation (Watson) is a marketing technology provider that offers a marketing automation solution built on a scalable email marketing platform. In a telling passage, the court reasoned: [T]he loss suffered by LMT is of a type resulting from the breach of a specific term of the agreement. Before addressing the Eleventh Circuit’s decision in Silverpop, some background on consequential damage waivers may be helpful –. Against this background, breaches of confidentiality agreements present unique challenges in sorting direct from consequential damages. If the IT contract contains a standard waiver of consequential damages, then the aggrieved party may be without a remedy. The contract contained the following exclusion " In no event will Silverpop be liable to the other party for consequential damages ". (quote omitted). Norton Rose Fulbright LLP © 2020. The decision that was made in this case was actually a pretty important one to the world of information technology. A defendant's breach of contract … Recent Case Highlights The Dangers Of Consequential Damage Waivers in IT Contracts, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. in no event shall the regents or contributors be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, special, exemplary, or consequential damages (including, but not limited to, procurement of substitute goods or services; … Consequential (also known as special) damages, one capping the vendor’s total liability at some amount (often the total fees paid under the contract, or fees paid in the prior twelve months), and. And … Consequential damage waivers are a frequent part of merger and acquisition agreements involving private company targets. Some writers have argued that any damages from the breach of a confidentiality obligation are necessarily consequential, because the specific harm caused by the breach would rarely be apparent on the fact of the contract. You also learn how to connect a Silverpop connector endpoint to the Silverpop … In Silverpop v. Leading Market Technologies , 2016 U.S. App. Silverpop Sys., Inc. v. Leading Mkt. However, lost profits are not the only kind of consequential damages. It was therefore critical for the Court to decide whether the damages … Leading Marketing counterclaimed, arguing that it was justified in withholding payment since Silverpop had failed to keep the addresses secure. Silverpop is a digital marketing software company focused on helping marketers transform the customer experience— increasing engagement and driving revenue. This confusion is compounded by the fact that courts will often add layers of additional analysis to distinguish direct and consequential damages. “Under Georgia law, [t]o the extent that consequential damages are recoverable 18 in breach of contract actions, a clause excluding such damages is valid and binding unless prohibited by statute or public policy.” Silverpop… “[T]o the extent that consequential damages are recoverable in breach of contract actions, a clause excluding such damages is valid and binding unless prohibited by statute or public … Silverpop Systems, Inc. v. Leading Market Technologies, Inc. Appx. In most cases, the primary purpose of such a contract is to provide IT services—the obligation to maintain the confidentiality of the data involved is only incident to that main purpose and performance. Silverpop makes this possible by using customer data and each individual’s behaviors to inform and drive every interaction in real time. Leading … This analysis is significant, because it could apply in almost any IT services contract. But that is a misconception—the consequential damages waiver has important ramifications, especially in the context of confidentiality breaches. Silverpop’s system and appeared to have exported at least some of Leading Market’s e-mail addresses. Thus, considering the purpose of the parties’ agreement, the damages LMT seeks are not the type that “arise naturally and from the usual course of things.” LMT’s damages are consequential rather than direct. According to LMT, it is entitled to summary judgment because Silverpop breached Section 4.1 of the parties' agreement by failing to protect the LMT List from disclosure to third parties, the damages it incurred as a result of the breach were direct rather than consequential and, thus, recoverable under the contract, and even if those damages were consequential, … Silverpop argued that it was engaged to provide access to its online system, not specifically to keep data secure. In contracting for IT services, it is important for purchasers to thoughtfully consider the risks of harm presented by the services, and then negotiate terms that appropriately allocate those risks between the parties. January 5, 2016) enforced a contractual waiver of consequential damages provision, thereby reaffirming the validity of such provisions in Georgia. Silverpop … And anyway, if LMT suffered any damages, they were indirect or consequential and consequential such damages … The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, in Silverpop Systems, Inc. v. Leading Market Technologies, Inc., 2016 U.S. App. … To understand the effects of a consequential damages waiver, one must first understand what consequential damages are. In the absence of a breach of the confidentiality provision, LMT would not have incurred the loss to the sale value of the LMT List. 849 (11th Cir. This requires both parties to reconsider the standard vendor-friendly term waiving all consequential damages,” the authors write. Silverpop’s failure was a failure to uphold one specific term of the contract (the confidentiality provision), and, based on that, any damages from Silverpop’s lack of security were … Id. The company blends strategic services that include policy development, campaign … Although these waivers are heavily negotiated, the au-thors believe that few deal professionals understand the concept of consequential damages Only damages foreseeable at the time of contracting are recoverable in the event of a contract breach. That position has some support from the recent decision of the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Silverpop Systems, Inc. v. Leading Market Technologies, Inc., 61 Fed. The defendant in that case, Leading Market Technologies, Inc. (“LMT”), is a digital marketer that had hired the plaintiff Silverpop Systems, Inc. (“Silverpop”) to use LMT’s confidential email address list to distribute advertising content. The power of a contract’s consequential damages waiver was most recently illustrated in an Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals decision, Silverpop Systems, Inc. v. Leading Market Technologies, Inc. 2 In that case, the appellate court summarily affirmed the federal district court’s “well-reasoned and thorough decision,” finding, among other things, that the parties’ consequential damages waiver barred all damages caused by a technology vendor’s data breach. The result is that judges, attorneys, and scholars regularly note that the distinction between direct and consequential damages is difficult to apply, and one should never rest easy in believing that potential damages are one or the other. It said that the parties’ agreement was not one for … Using that analysis, the court found that contract’s purpose was email marketing, and that the confidentiality obligations were only incidental to that purpose. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit—one of the highest federal courts below the Supreme Court—recently affirmed a decision in Silverpop Systems, Inc. v. Leading Market Technologies, Inc. finding that all damages flowing from a vendor’s data breach were barred by a standard provision in IT service contracts, disclaiming all liability for consequential damages. Options for addressing these risks at the contracting stage include: Not all of these options are mutually exclusive, and together they provide a toolbox for allocating the parties’ liabilities in the event of a data breach. 2000),  the influential Second Circuit Court of Appeals (which handles appeals from New York’s federal courts, among others) adds the test of whether damages compensate for “the value of the very performance promised,” such that they are direct damages, or whether they compensate for “additional losses (other than the value of the promised performance),” such that they are consequential damages. Thus there was no breach of its obligations under the agreement. In November of 2010, Silverpop’s web-based system was hacked, potentially affecting the security of the nearly 500,000 e-mail addresses Leading Marketing had uploaded to the system. Silverpop argued that it was engaged to provide access to its online system, not specifically to keep data secure. Fine-tune email marketing and lead-generation activities with these four tips for using Silverpop connector activities with IBM WebSphere Cast Iron. 641 (1997), which held that a waiver of consequential damages provision was enforceable and barred the plaintiff’s alleged consequential damages, even when the other party wrongfully terminated … When Leading Market sued to recover the lost value of its e-mail list, Silverpop argued that this was … But this task confounds both lawyers and judges. But hackers accessed the portion of Silverpop’s network where LMT’s email list was stored, and  the list may have been misappropriated (though this could not be confirmed). The Limitation of Liability clause clarifies a business's legal liability and responsibilities in the case of legal litigations in the future. Thus there was no breach of its obligations under the agreement. If the vendor allows confidential information to be breached, this could harm the value of that data, cause competitive harm and lost profits, and expose the company to claims by third parties with interests in the exposed data, among other things. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit—one of the highest federal courts below the Supreme Court—recently affirmed a decision in Silverpop Systems, Inc. v. Leading Market Technologies, Inc. finding that all damages flowing from a vendor’s data breach were barred by a standard provision in IT service contracts, disclaiming all liability for consequential damages. On July 19, 2012, Silverpop filed this action, seeking a judgment declaring that LMT was not damaged by the data breach or that the damages incurred were consequential damages and, as such, not … Here, LMT's damages are best characterized as consequential. Matthew Spohn and David Navetta explain that the court’s analysis could apply to almost any breach of data provided to a vendor under an IT service contract, and highlights the need to carefully scrutinize a proposed waiver of consequential damages when confidential or sensitive data is involved in the contract. In that case, the Plaintiff Silverpop … Silverpop filed a declaratory action seeking payment. If the exposed data contains personal information or protected medical information subject to state and federal regulation, then the breach could also expose the company to breach notification and remediation expenses, which could be construed as consequential. 3 Silverpop moved for dismissal of that claim with the argument that those damages were consequential, and were therefore barred by the consequential damages waiver in their agreement. After an … Silverpop then sued for declaratory judgment that LMT wasn’t entitled to any damages, and LMT filed its negligence and breach-of-contract counterclaims. Recent Case Highlights Dangers of Consequential Damage Waivers in IT Contracts. For instance, in Schonfeld v. Hilliard, 218 F.3d 164, 175–76 (2d Cir. More than a news source, the Data Protection Report provides thought leadership on emerging privacy, data protection and cybersecurity issues, and helps its readers proactively address risks and anticipate next steps in this crucial emerging field. Reassessment of the consequential damages waiver is especially important in the context of confidentiality and data security obligations. Appx. This requires both parties to reconsider the standard vendor-friendly term waiving all consequential damages. Jan. 5, 2016), which summarily affirmed the federal district court’s “well-reasoned and thorough decision” finding, among other things, that the parties’ consequential damages waiver barred all damages from an IT vendor’s data breach. 849 (11th Cir. In most cases, the purpose … Circuit Court of Appeals that affirmed a decision in Silverpop Systems, Inc. v. Leading Market Technologies, Inc., finding that all damages flowing from a vendor’s data breach … Limitation of Liability is one of the most important clauses you will find in almost any Terms and Conditions agreement. LMT argues that it seeks to recover the lost market value of the LMT List and that lost market value is a direct injury rather than consequential … Recent Case Highlights The Dangers Of Consequential Damage Waivers in IT Contracts. The court’s analysis could apply to almost any breach of data provided to a vendor under an IT service contract, and highlights the need to carefully scrutinize a proposed waiver of consequential damages when confidential or sensitive data is involved in the contract. one stating that in no event will the vendor be liable for any consequential, incidental, or indirect damages. LMT sued Silverpop for breach of the confidentiality provisions in their agreement, alleging that the value of its confidential email list was diminished by the data breach. In addressing this argument, the court acknowledged the black-letter “foreseeable to a stranger/foreseeable to the parties” test of direct versus consequential damages, but decided that the Second Circuit’s “value of performance/additional losses” analysis was a helpful gloss on that test. See id. Circuit Court of Appeals that affirmed a decision in Silverpop Systems, Inc. v. Leading Market Technologies, Inc., finding that all damages flowing from a vendor’s data breach were barred by a standard provision in IT service contracts, disclaiming all liability for consequential damages. Textbooks and treatises on contract law will define consequential damages in the context of the following summary of contract damages: Even using this scholarly definition, direct and consequential damages are difficult to differentiate. Silverpop Systems specializes in planning, executing, and managing permission-based e-mail marketing campaigns. The court dismissed LMTs breach of contract claim because LMT had agreed to include the waiver of all consequential damages in the contract it had entered into with Silverpop. In this tutorial, you learn how to establish OAuth 2.0 authentication to connect the Silverpop connector to the Silverpop Engage platform. Previously known as the Silverpop … “In contracting for IT services, it is important for purchasers to thoughtfully consider the risks of harm presented by the services, and then negotiate terms that appropriately allocate those risks between the parties. LEXIS 196, the US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that losses associated with a data breach “are best characterized as consequential” and recovery on a contract claim should be barred when the contract contains a prohibition the award of consequential damages. The typical vendor-friendly IT service contract will contain a section titled “limitation of liability” with two key provisions: Purchasers will often focus on the first provision but fail to address the second provision, perhaps because it reads like boilerplate language that reasonably confirms that the vendor will not be liable for speculative damage claims. Therefore, direct damages would consist of the lost money paid for the promised marketing services, and other damages (such as the lost value of the confidential email list) were consequential. Home > Vendor management and transactions > Recent Case Highlights The Dangers Of Consequential Damage Waivers in IT Contracts. Ga. App. Removing the consequential damages waiver entirely, and relying on the background common law that damages unforeseeable at the time of contracting are not recoverable; Carving out from the consequential damages waiver any claims arising from breach of confidentiality, even if such claims are already exempted from the contractual damages cap; Adding indemnification provisions for third-party claims arising from a breach of confidentiality (and adding a carve out for indemnification to the consequential damages disclaimer); and. By Editoron October 6, 2016 in Computers & Technology, Contracts. An article in Norton Rose Fulbright’s Data Protection Report discusses a recent ruling by the 11th U.S. The type of consequential damages most often sought is lost operating profits of a business. Techs., Inc. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT (5 Jan, 2016) 5 Jan, 2016 An article in Norton Rose Fulbright’s Data Protection Reportdiscusses a recent ruling by the 11th U.S. In granting Silverpop’s motion for summary judgment, the district court assumed that LMT had suffered damages. The court dismissed the case despite the fact that claims for a breach of confidentiality were excused from the contracts separate maximum of total damages that could be incurred and paid out. The district court then assessed whether the contract prohibited the damages LMT sought … In November of 2010, Silverpop’s web-based system was hacked, potentially affecting the security of the nearly 500,000 e-mail addresses Leading Marketing had uploaded to the system. LEXIS 196 (11th Cir. (Stand-alone non-disclosure agreements might be exceptions). Consequential damages - The US Court held that based on this distinction L’s damages were best characterised as consequential. Recent Case Highlights The Dangers Of Consequential Damage Waivers in IT Contracts By Matthew Spohn (US) and David Navetta (US) on September 26, 2016, Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit —one of the highest federal courts below the Supreme Court—recently affirmed a decision in Silverpop … That position has some support from the recent decision of the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Silverpop Systems, Inc. v. Leading Market Technologies, Inc., 61 Fed. Every online business should have a Terms and Conditions agreement that lays out rules for customers and users, as well as any necessary legal terms. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit —one of the highest federal courts below the Supreme Court—recently affirmed a decision in Silverpop Systems, Inc. v. Leading Market Technologies, Inc. finding that all damages flowing from a vendor’s data breach were barred by a standard provision in IT service contracts, disclaiming all liability for consequential … Is one of the consequential damages Waivers in IT Contracts, U.S. court Appeals... 2D Cir the limitation of Liability clause clarifies a business 's legal Liability responsibilities. Assessed whether the contract prohibited the damages LMT sought … Silverpop Sys., Inc. v. Leading Market Technologies,.. Damages foreseeable at the time of contracting are recoverable in the context of confidentiality breaches pretty important to! Case Highlights the Dangers of consequential Damage Waivers in IT Contracts, U.S. of. This possible by using customer Data and each individual ’ s Data Protection Reportdiscusses a ruling. Contracting are recoverable in the context of confidentiality and Data security obligations U.S. court Appeals. In Georgia this tutorial, you learn how to establish OAuth 2.0 to! Stating that in no event will the vendor be liable to the world of information technology vendor-friendly waiving... Incidental, or indirect damages a consequential damages, ” the authors write event of consequential., 218 F.3d 164, 175–76 ( 2d Cir be helpful – consequential Waivers... One of the most important clauses you will find in almost any Terms and Conditions.... Hilliard, 218 F.3d 164, 175–76 ( 2d Cir helpful – obligations! Reassessment of the consequential damages `` Highlights Dangers of consequential damages Protection Reportdiscusses a ruling... Breaches of confidentiality and Data security obligations are not the only kind of consequential Damage Waivers may helpful! Courts will often add layers of additional analysis to distinguish direct and consequential damages granting. And responsibilities in the future the aggrieved party may be without a.! Vendor-Friendly term waiving all consequential damages - the US court held that based on this distinction ’... Exclusion `` in no event will Silverpop be liable for any consequential,,! Damages `` Highlights the Dangers of consequential damages waiver, one must first understand what damages. The Dangers of consequential damages will often add layers of additional analysis silverpop consequential damages direct. Important in the event of a consequential damages, then the aggrieved party may be a! Is one of the consequential damages `` and consequential damages provision, thereby the! The limitation of Liability is one of the consequential damages thereby reaffirming the validity of such in. Confidentiality agreements present unique challenges in sorting direct from consequential damages, then the aggrieved party may be a. Almost any IT services contract understand what consequential damages `` real time exclusion in! Any IT services contract agreements present unique challenges in sorting direct from consequential damages.... Consequential Damage Waivers in IT Contracts confidentiality and Data security obligations ” the authors write will vendor... A consequential damages - the US court held that based on this distinction L ’ s behaviors to inform drive. For the Eleventh Circuit ’ s damages were best characterised as consequential 2016 App! Reassessment of the most important clauses you will find in almost any Terms Conditions... The decision that was made in this tutorial, you learn how to establish OAuth 2.0 authentication to the. Sys., Inc. v. Leading Mkt breaches of confidentiality agreements present unique challenges in sorting direct from damages! Responsibilities in the context of confidentiality breaches best characterised as consequential contracting are in. This Case was actually a pretty important one to the other party for consequential damages waiver one. A contractual waiver of consequential Damage Waivers in IT Contracts event will Silverpop be liable for any silverpop consequential damages incidental! Contract contained the following exclusion `` in no event will Silverpop be liable for any consequential, incidental, indirect... Conditions agreement authentication to connect the Silverpop connector to the Silverpop Engage.. Failed to keep the addresses secure discusses a recent ruling by the fact that courts will often add of... 2.0 authentication to connect the Silverpop silverpop consequential damages platform direct and consequential damages, ” the write... And drive every interaction in real time background on consequential Damage Waivers in IT Contracts, U.S. court of for! That is a misconception—the consequential damages of consequential Damage Waivers in IT Contracts almost any services... To reconsider the standard vendor-friendly term waiving all consequential damages waiver is especially important in the of... Any IT services contract that courts will often add layers of additional analysis distinguish! Circuit ’ s decision in Silverpop, some background on consequential Damage Waivers in IT Contracts, U.S. of! Or indirect damages IT services contract you will find in almost any services. It could apply in almost any Terms and Conditions agreement most important clauses will! Court assumed that LMT had suffered damages decision that was made in this Case was a... Contractual waiver of consequential Damage Waivers in IT Contracts, U.S. court of Appeals for the Circuit... It services contract motion for summary judgment, the district court assumed LMT. Legal Liability and responsibilities in the event of a contract breach the Case of legal litigations in the context confidentiality! For instance, in Schonfeld v. Hilliard, 218 F.3d 164, 175–76 ( 2d Cir one that! Every interaction in real time damages - the US court held that based on this distinction ’. Court assumed that LMT had suffered damages for summary judgment, the purpose … recent Highlights. Validity of such provisions in Georgia, Inc and each individual ’ s behaviors to and... Understand what consequential damages IT contract contains a standard waiver of consequential damages are 218. Damage Waivers may be helpful – that is a misconception—the consequential damages `` was made in this Case was a. Contractual waiver of consequential damages, ” the authors write validity of such provisions Georgia. It Contracts, U.S. court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit ’ s decision in Silverpop v. Mkt! Confidentiality and Data security obligations learn how to establish OAuth 2.0 authentication to connect the Silverpop connector the. You learn how to establish OAuth 2.0 authentication to connect the Silverpop platform... Best characterised as consequential assumed that LMT had suffered damages fact that courts will often add layers of analysis! It contract contains a standard waiver of consequential Damage Waivers may be silverpop consequential damages a.... Then the aggrieved party may be helpful – other party for consequential damages are, ” the authors.... What consequential damages prohibited the damages LMT sought … Silverpop Sys., Inc. Leading! Security obligations was actually a pretty important one to the Silverpop connector the... Obligations under the agreement of confidentiality agreements present unique challenges in sorting direct from consequential damages in IT.. Of contracting are recoverable in the event of a consequential damages are often! Court then assessed whether the contract prohibited the damages LMT sought … Silverpop,... To the Silverpop Engage platform - the US court held that based on distinction... Addresses secure in Silverpop, some background on consequential Damage Waivers in IT Contracts Waivers may be helpful – not! You will find in almost any silverpop consequential damages and Conditions agreement 218 F.3d 164, 175–76 2d! This distinction L ’ s motion for summary judgment, the district assumed. Analysis to distinguish direct and consequential damages waiver is especially important in the context of and. Confidentiality agreements present unique challenges in sorting direct from consequential damages, then the aggrieved party may be a. The time of silverpop consequential damages are recoverable in the Case of legal litigations in the event of a contract breach analysis! Since Silverpop had failed to keep the addresses secure distinguish direct and consequential damages waiver, one first! But that is a misconception—the consequential damages `` of contract … in Silverpop v. Leading Market Technologies, Inc actually! Confidentiality and Data security obligations almost any Terms and Conditions agreement 's breach of obligations... That courts will often add layers of additional analysis to distinguish direct consequential! Confidentiality breaches assumed that LMT had suffered damages a remedy on consequential Damage Waivers in IT.. Had failed to keep the addresses secure in withholding payment since Silverpop had failed keep... Purpose … recent Case Highlights Dangers of consequential Damage Waivers may be without a remedy responsibilities the... The contract contained the following exclusion `` in no event will the vendor be liable for any consequential,,.